A bombshell investigation published on September 8, 2026, reveals explosive allegations that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu received a direct warning about the October 7, 2023 attack approximately ten days before the devastating assault occurred. The Netanyahu October 7 warning claim has sent shockwaves through Israeli politics and sparked immediate reactions from former government officials.
UAE President’s Alleged 45-Minute Warning Call
According to research conducted for the new book “Hostages: 843 Days of Abandonment,” by investigators Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval, UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed allegedly called Netanyahu on a secure line. The report claims the call lasted 45 minutes and included explicit warnings that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was planning a major operation against Israel.
The investigation states that bin Zayed feared the planned attack would destabilize the entire region and threaten the Abraham Accords, the historic normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states. These claims represent one of the most serious allegations against Netanyahu’s handling of pre-attack intelligence.
Netanyahu reportedly responded calmly during the alleged call, telling bin Zayed he believed Hamas intended to operate in the West Bank rather than Gaza. He reportedly assured the UAE leader that Israel was prepared for any scenario.
Security Chiefs Allegedly Never Briefed
Perhaps most damaging in the Netanyahu October 7 warning report is the claim that none of Israel’s top security officials received information about the alleged warning. According to the investigation, the heads of the Shin Bet, Mossad, and the IDF chief of staff were never briefed on the warning from the UAE president.
A senior Shin Bet official reportedly told the book’s authors that had the warning been shared with security leadership, “it could have changed our entire assessment picture.” This statement underscores the potential significance of the alleged communication failure.
Former Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar and former IDF Chief of Staff Herzl Halevi have both stated they were never informed of the warning attributed to bin Zayed, adding weight to claims that critical intelligence was not properly disseminated.
Secret Hamas Negotiation Channel Revealed
The investigation traces the origins of the warning back to a secret Israel-Hamas communication channel that had been negotiating a temporary truce and prisoner arrangement since early 2023. According to the report, this channel was approved by Netanyahu himself.
In September 2023, Hamas leader Sinwar abruptly cut off contact with this channel. He allegedly told a Fatah intermediary, referred to in the report as “Coal Eyes,” to warn Israel that he was preparing what he called “the mother of all surprises.”
“Sinwar used the word ‘zilzal,’ or earthquake, to describe what was coming.”
This warning was reportedly relayed to bin Zayed’s adviser and eventually reached Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, who allegedly briefed Netanyahu by phone on September 15, 2023. A security meeting held two days later reportedly ended without any decision being made.
Parallel Warning from Egyptian Intelligence
The investigation reveals that Netanyahu allegedly received a second warning around the same time from Egyptian intelligence chief Abbas Kamel. Kamel reportedly warned Netanyahu of “something unusual, a terrifying operation” being planned.
However, the report states that Netanyahu told the Egyptian official that Israel’s focus and military forces were concentrated on the West Bank, not Gaza. This response allegedly came despite multiple warnings from regional intelligence sources about potential threats from the Gaza Strip.
On October 1, 2023, just six days before the attack, Shin Bet chief Bar reportedly recommended targeting senior Hamas officials including Sinwar. According to the investigation, Netanyahu’s response was characteristic of his decision-making style.
“Prepare plans for me and I will consider them.”
A senior defense official described this response as Netanyahu’s standard way of postponing decisions, according to the book’s findings.
Strong Official Denials from Prime Minister’s Office
The Netanyahu October 7 warning allegations have been met with forceful denials from the Israeli government. The prime minister’s office issued a statement categorically rejecting the report’s claims.
“Prime Minister Netanyahu didn’t speak to the president of the UAE during the period in question and received no warning from him. This is an absolute lie.”
The book’s researchers reportedly reached out to UAE President bin Zayed for comment but did not receive a response. This lack of confirmation from the UAE side leaves questions about the full verification of the alleged warning call.
Former PM Bennett Confirms Report’s Accuracy
Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett responded to the investigation by confirming its accuracy on social media platform X. His statement directly contradicted the denials from Netanyahu’s office and represented the most significant political reaction to the report.
“The announcement that Netanyahu was warned ten days before the October 7 massacre is true. Netanyahu bears personal and direct responsibility for the oversight that led to the deaths of thousands of Israelis on his watch.”
Bennett accused Netanyahu of “criminal negligence” in his handling of the warnings. He stated that Netanyahu “did not go into the field, did not alert the heads of the security establishment, did not prepare Israel for an attack, and did not convene the cabinet.”
The former prime minister further accused Netanyahu of being “captive to his own concept” even when faced with explicit warnings from regional leaders. Bennett suggested that the full truth about the intelligence failures would eventually be revealed.
What This Means for the Latin Community in Canada
For the Latin community in Canada, understanding these developments in Israel-Hamas relations provides important context for ongoing global events. Many Latin Americans in Canada maintain connections to both regions and follow Middle East developments closely.
The allegations in this report could have significant implications for:
- Regional stability in the Middle East affecting global migration patterns
- The future of the Abraham Accords and diplomatic relations
- International pressure on Israel regarding accountability for the October 7 intelligence failures
- Potential changes in Israeli government leadership
Canadian foreign policy observers are watching these developments closely, as they may influence future diplomatic positions and humanitarian responses.
Calls for State Commission Investigation
The release of this investigation has intensified calls for a formal state commission of inquiry into the events leading up to October 7, 2023. Various Israeli political figures and families of victims have demanded comprehensive accountability measures.
The father of a slain hostage recently called for political parties to support the establishment of an October 7 state commission, though he downplayed speculation about his own potential election run. This reflects growing public pressure for official investigations into the intelligence and leadership failures.
Former hostage Eli Sharabi has been announced as the host for an upcoming October 7 commemoration ceremony, stating “We will never forget what happened.” These memorial events continue to keep public attention focused on accountability questions.
What does the new investigation claim about Netanyahu?
The investigation claims that UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed called Netanyahu ten days before October 7, 2023, warning him for 45 minutes that Hamas leader Sinwar was planning a major operation against Israel. Netanyahu allegedly never shared this warning with his security chiefs.
Has Netanyahu responded to the allegations?
Yes, the prime minister’s office issued a statement calling the report “an absolute lie” and denying that Netanyahu spoke to the UAE president during the period in question or received any warning from him.
Who has confirmed the report’s accuracy?
Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett confirmed on social media that the report about Netanyahu receiving a warning ten days before the massacre is true, accusing Netanyahu of “criminal negligence.”
What book contains this investigation?
The investigation was conducted for the book “Hostages: 843 Days of Abandonment,” researched by investigators Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval.
The political fallout from these allegations continues to develop in Israel. With calls mounting for formal investigations and former officials like Bennett confirming key aspects of the report, pressure on Netanyahu’s government is expected to intensify in the coming weeks. The Israeli Defense Forces recently conducted a “Breaking Dawn 2.0” readiness exercise, suggesting ongoing security concerns remain at the forefront of military planning as the nation grapples with the aftermath of October 7 and these new revelations about pre-attack intelligence.
